Yes, We are creating a dipole, collapsing it and collecting the radiant spike.
Very interesting to hear you say that. What exactly do you believe a dipole to be and where did you learn about the term?
To be honest I don't know much about the hairpin circuit but looking at the schematic it looks to me like the idea is to create a standing wave of radiant. Theoretically this could cause a flow of radiant instead of just spikes if the frequency is high enough. I guess the downside is tuning the circuit as a significant amount of energy is used to set up the wave and if you are out with your tuning there will only be a small return compared to the input.
The frequency that has been experimented with in the videos on my youtube channel is 60hz at 10,000 volts.
The circuit has already been proved to be OU just using basic off the shelf components. In one experiment on my youtube channel, the input wattage on the AC side with no load attached on the Scalar side is 304 watts. When a load is attached to the Scaler side the wattage drops to 242watts on the AC side.http://www.youtube.com/paultheangel#p/f/4/SoXm4zuGszU
I have come to the conclusion that radiant is a gift of energy that is not so practical to use directly for our conventional circuits, so the best thing to with it is to put it in a capacitor in the source line and use it to power our devices conventionally therefore only requiring a small input to top up the losses. I believe resonance effects are caused the addition of radiant in the form of standing waves.
I also believe it is a gift that we can harness and the resonance is the key. I also believe I have the circuit diagrams and knowledge for various converter circuits to use the energy from the ambient environment (radiant energy) and turn it into household AC.
Einstein understood mathematics and said if the maths do not add up it cannot be, Tesla understood nature and said what is, is. Einstein experimented with mathematical models to find the "truth", Tesla experimented with nature to find reality. Its not that Einstein was wrong, he just didn't have all the parameters.
Einstein was using Maxwell's simplified vector equation and not the original Quaternation equations that Tesla was using.
Please look at http://www.deltaavalon.com/immagini/Tes ... ersion.pdf
page 30 - 35 for the maths.
The whole document is brilliant. Dr Roberto Handwerker is one of the pioneers of this old school technology. His work and others has helped me to understand what Tesla and others were doing back then and how it all got supressed by the banks and energy companies that pull all the strings on the globe.
If that is not a comfortable subject to talk about then that's fine. I am looking for experimenters to work with to replicate, film and document some mind blowing energy experiments.
POWER TO THE PEOPLE!!!!!