Hi JustAnElectrician'
I just joined 'Imhotep's Lab Interactive forum' hoping to find the YouTubeVid'-promise of
"Free Energy" (Step By Step) but all I have found is battery-hobbying' - no 'Free Energy'
Did I miss something?
(name deleted by JAE)
REPLY:
Well, presumably you can get several battery charges from 1 source (drive) battery.
But "battery conditioning" is needed to get full use of the radiant charge. Many
have done this and I have never yet had to charge my drive batteries. Meanwhile
charging many batteries multiple times but they have been smaller batts,
but most have been high capacity Ni-Cads and NiMH drill batteries. If I counted
charge cycles and Amp Hours, I think it is likely I have already demonstrated
OVERUNITY perhaps exceeding 200%! I am preparing a big OU scientific trial, I
have 2 huge marine deep-cycle group 24 batteries, but it would be best to load
test one of them as a controlled test, then see how many times I can recharge it
with the other battery. IF I get more energy out of the charge battery cycling
then it proves the IRO is adding energy to the second battery, more than the
source battery is using to run the IRO. Sounds simple, but rigorous scientific
method calls for precise measurements, and sound protocol. It's hard to prove
the "identical" batteries are identical, but it is possible to get them quite close.
I'm still working on it, but I still believe I can get an arguable "OU" result
maybe even without "conditioned" batteries. I think an IROL (light) setup
can show a calculated/measured OU result even easier, it lights a 12W CFL
while charging a secondary battery at the same time! It gives an estimated
3 to 4 watts of light while charging at a close to 1:1 rate! However, any
"scientific" method person would say that we are not measuring the light
output, and the "response" curve of the CFL might be a high light output
at a low wattage, and therefore NOT VALID. So we need good instrumentation,
and also need to verify how inefficient the CFL circuit really is... it is only a
PF of around 55% or so, meaning the true wattage is almost double... and
you pay for that inefficiency! So it is an engineering question, and it boils down
to this:
What is our charging efficiency, and what is our lighting efficiency?
Does this exceed 100%?
If it does, then the source of our "extra energy" must be the coil, and likely
it is the "Copper Loss" (Newman Theory) or "Radiant Energy" (Tesla/Bedini Theory).
Even the "battery hobby" is worthwhile, I have saved many drill batteries and
have never failed to charge any style of battery, and the driver batts last a long,
long time. The slower you discharge a lead-acid battery, the more energy you
get from it. So that kinda skews things too... lending to the skeptic's view.
ALSO: Shiva is working on lots of things, and getting the video you requested
is one of these things. Anyone with a copy, please let us know!
