icap123 wrote:
I don't understand what I obtain with the SCR, I just replicated from bedini scheme hahaha, so:
...anybody can explain me the SCR benefit?, is the same if I remove it?
this is my circuit:
http://img186.imagevenue.com/img.php?im ... 2_71lo.JPG
I'm not a Bedini Fan experimenter (yet?) but I do have experience with the SCR on my IRO (radiant oscillator)
It seems the pulses of a Bedini coil arrangement and the IRO both produce a conventional (electron)
current that is somewhat AC in waveform. (having positive and negative phases) in addition to the radiant flow that is initiated during the sharp "off" phase.
The SCR or FWBR (made up of diodes which are similar to a "fixed operation" SCR, both are "rectifiers")
this FWBR rectifies all of the conventional current component to make that portion of the signal stronger,
instead of having a partial discharging signal with the conventional current component.
In simpler terms, it raises the output "voltage" and efficiency of these devices.
My IRO went from ~50VDC to ~70VDC with a FWBR on it!
That was not the "spike" voltage, those were much higher.
Average output was raised some 40%.
I'd leave the SCR in there, in this case you would likely have to jumper it out and maybe do something for the trigger wire too. I suspect it is there for higher output. I'm having trouble viewing your drawing, but I'd say it (SCR) is needed.