| Imhotep's Lab Interactive FAQ http://imhotepslabs.freeforums.org/ |
|
| TIRED OF SCREWING AROUND WITH THIS http://imhotepslabs.freeforums.org/tired-of-screwing-around-with-this-t114.html |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | JustAnElectrician [ Sun May 17, 2009 11:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | TIRED OF SCREWING AROUND WITH THIS |
 So I plan to get serious and make a huge coil, to see if OU is possible! Or simply more output than input from a big copper coil. Newman and Bedini cannot both be wrong (IMO) but I bet I can find something here to keep me interested for a while yet. Big Solid State IRO with a huge copper coil. Free Energy is coming! |
|
| Author: | mbrownn [ Fri May 22, 2009 3:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TIRED OF SCREWING AROUND WITH THIS |
I’m sure you understand this already but I will say it for those that don’t. Energy can neither be created nor destroyed, but we can change its form. We can convert it from one form to another. In our devices we seem to be creating energy, but in fact we are not, so what is happening? We are able to get energy from another source which we are not paying for. In our device the total amount of energy in the system is 100%. Some energy is converted from normal electrical energy to magnetic energy and some to heat and other losses. If we are using a motor some energy is converted to mechanical power. We do have efficiency losses just the same as any other device. The way that we wire our devices enables us to collect some of the losses and this we feed to batteries and charge them. This energy is NOT normal electricity because we are unable to get true readings of amps. When we measure the amount of energy we have put into the charged battery we find it is almost as much as the energy we used to run the device. When we measure the total energy we put into the device and compare it with the total energy we get out of it we find it is less than 100% efficient but when we add the energy in the charging battery and the losses we appear to have more than we put in. Where did this energy come from? The truth is we did not create it, it came from the environment. This is sometimes noticeable because of a cooling effect on some of the equipment and the charging battery. This is why some people call it cold energy. By adding other energy recovery systems to the device we are able to increase the total output (put a generator on the output of the motor). This increases the overall performance or COP (coefficient of performance) Building bigger makes it easier to make something that is efficient and the more useful the amount of energy we are collecting. |
|
| Author: | miloman [ Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TIRED OF SCREWING AROUND WITH THIS |
Well with that said,,, you just "DESTROYED" my "ENERGY" of motivation to continue my quest for something you say dosent exist,,,, for the moment I almost believed myself there, but that like the time and energy used to write this is gone,,,HUMMM, think I will think again |
|
| Author: | mbrownn [ Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TIRED OF SCREWING AROUND WITH THIS |
Don't be put off. We are getting more energy than we put in. our attempts are primitive devices for collecting energy from the environment. We are not even scratching the surface, our small devices are both toys and learning tools. The goal is to collect large amounts of energy, Tesla and others demonstrated that it is possible and even practical. What we have to do is to learn what they knew then try to improve on it. Most devices that have produced large amounts of energy have been large and high voltage however John Bedini produced a low voltage high output device that was not that big. When i look at his big motor i can see that it is not efficient at producing torque and could be improved. He has stated that he has obtained a COP of 12. if he used a small amount of the torque and generated more power and found a way to put it in his batteries without destroying the over unity/negative resistance effect the COP will be raised much higher. Just think our best conventional generators work at a cop of less than 1, most Bedini fans are working at a higher cop than that. This is a huge achievement. We are getting closer to understanding the devices built by the inventors in the past. I believe we are close to the breakthrough |
|
| Author: | JustAnElectrician [ Sun Aug 02, 2009 6:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TIRED OF SCREWING AROUND WITH THIS |
miloman wrote: Well with that said,,, you just "DESTROYED" my "ENERGY" of motivation to continue my quest for something you say dosent exist,,,, for the moment I almost believed myself there, but that like the time and energy used to write this is gone,,,HUMMM, think I will think again What we are saying is that we are trying to tap a previously un-tapped source of environmental energy, which is what Tesla referred to as the "Wheelwork of Nature" so keep trying! Since it is not tapped on a large scale by man, some think it does not exist but particle physics has proven that it is indeed there! It may be energy from dimensions outside of space/time or just something that remains hard to detect while being all around us in ordinary spacial 3 dimensions... String theory allows for 11 dimensions last I heard, and most of these extra 7 dimensions are likely energy fields. Welcome MiloMan! |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|